vwwc
TORAH U'MESORAH M'SINAI
Teaching & Tradition from Mt. Sinai
A Home of Torah-Based Outreach
to Yidden (Jews) Around the World

TORAH U'MESORAH M'SINAI Home Especially for Non Jews
Our Site Map YNbenAvraham@aol.com


 

A Ger In Search of Torah HaEmes
(A Convert to Torah Observant Judaism Searching for the True Torah)

A Ger's Commentary on "Kol HaTorah Kulah"
"The Gallus Effect"

INTRODUCTION
[This is a work in progress.  This work represents where this author is holding in his learning of HaShem's Torah, and the thoughts contained herein should not be considered representative of of the outlook of Torah Observant Jews [though this author believes that they should be!] 

     HaShem’s Torah, His “Instruction Manual” to lead us on “the path” of the most successful life humanly possible, is best learned, understood and implemented when Klal Yisroel is living in The Land, with a Temple, a Kohain Gadol, a Prophet, a Sanhedrin, and with a “king of flesh and blood” (Mashiach) sitting on his earthly throne.  However, resulting from our sins, we were forced out of The Land, and we lost the Sanhedrin – the body tasked with keeping the Torah as single, cohesive unit.  Unfortunately, the demise of the Sanhedrin has left us – over this nearly two thousand year exile – with a seeming multitude of opinions, commentaries, and [sad to say] Torahs. [See Sefer HaChinuch to Devarim 17]

     As Jews living in the Gallus, we all desire the Geulah, the Redemption, but we also know that T’shuvah must come before the Geulah can begin.  But haven’t we been doing t’shuvah all along?  Three times a day, on top of Selichos and the Yomim Na’aroim, we have the opportunity – the duty – to do t’shuvah.  Yet the Gallus continues.  Perhaps, just perhaps the t’shuvah we have done has not been the T’shuvah Shalaymah that is necessary before the commencement of the Redemption. 

     T’shuvah Shalaymah – complete repentance – just might include the examination of certain beliefs and traditions that may not be authentic Torah M’Sinai.  T’shuvah Shalaymah has to encompass return to HaShem as He is – rather than as we may have redefined Him, and return to His Torah as He gave it to us – rather than the extra-Torah we may have incorporated during this Gallus

     When we say Viduy [integral to T’shuvah Shalaymah], are we saying Viduy Shalaymah, or is the Viduy we say – perhaps – Viduy L’Vatallah?  [“...Rather we and our forefathers have sinned....”]

     The following is a list of areas that this author believes may be circumspect, areas where turning away from tainted beliefs and traditions may be standing in the way of our long-awaited Geulah:

     1) Can there ever be a change to any of the Taryag Mitzvos?  [Specifically the Or HaChayim on Bamidbar 3:45 suggests that the firstborn will participate in the avodah in the Third Temple.]

     2) The popularization of Kabbalah, and the incorporation of Kabbalistic ideas into everyday Jewish life.  [Contrary to the teachings of the Rambam, the Ramban, and the Rema – all of whom warn against learning the esoteric side of Torah.]

            #) Isn’t HaShem’s Torah supposed to clarify our thoughts about HaShem, His Will, Olam Hazeh, etc., rather than muddy the waters, and/or cloud the issues?

     3) Nishmas Chelek Elokah M’Ma’al – the belief that the neshamah is not a creation, but rather is literally a “piece” of HaShem.

     4) Gilgul HaNefesh – the belief that a “soul” may reincarnate into another body, a body other that that which it occupied originally.

     5) The belief that all creation literally “emanated” from HaShem [in stark contrast to the doctrine of Creatio Ex Nihilo].

     6) The Torah concept of the Mesorah, coupled with the concept of Emunas Chachamim.  [If we accept every teaching of every Sage are we not culpable of “blind faith” as there are teachings, concepts, and traditions of one Sage that definitely contradict other Sages’ teachings, concepts, and traditions?]

            #) Isn’t HaShem’s Torah supposed to keep us separate from the nations, rather that separate from from each other?

            #) “One man, with one Heart” & “One Heart, and one way”

            #) Isn’t a teacher of Torah is supposed to consider his students’ levels of learning, and explain his teachings in a way that they will be clear to the students, rather than assume that all who hear his words or read his writings will grasp his intended meaning?

            #) Isn’t someone who writes about Torah need to consider the lowest common denominators when codifying their teachings, as something written can/will outlast the author, and might be misunderstood by a reader one hundred and eighty years hence?

            #) While it is virtually impossible to anticipate all of the types of mishugas that human-beings could possibly come up with in their attempts to deny the existence of HaShem, or to bend to the Will of His Torah, it is not possible to review the mistakes of the past, and to do our best not to repeat those mistakes, or to lend credence to those erroneous beliefs and/or practices?

     7) Mashiach Mishugas – What we say is what people hear.  What people hear is what is incorporated into their belief systems.  What is in one’s belief system is what one will say when he is explaining a concept to a third person.  “We all know that HaShem does the miracles, we just say the Mashiach because....” Because that is how we talk!  We must be clear Who the Painter is, who the paintbrush is, and what painting we are looking forward to viewing.  [Compared to virtually all of the rest of mankind the king of flesh and blood who most of us long for, the Mashiach, will be like a mountain compared to an imperfection of a shochet’s knife; however, when comparing this king of flesh and blood to HaShem – there can be no comparison.  And for Torah Observant Jews, the purveyors of HaShem’s Torah, to blur the distinctions between or Heavenly King, and the king of flesh and blood who will be His toll to bring about the Geulah, is to this Jew by Choice incomprehensible.]

     8) Kiruv: But what exactly are we bringing the wayward Yid back to?  The basics should be emphasized so as to create a proper foundation upon which to built his future Talmud Torah and Avodas HaShem;

            1) The Shema [Said twice daily, and fully understood]

            2) Ashrei [Said thrice daily, and fully understood]

            3) The First two Commandments from Sinai

            4) The Six Constant Mitzvos

            5) The Thirteen Principles of Steadfast Faithfulness

            6) Sefer HaMada [the Book of Knowledge[1]] & the Mitzvos associated therewith

     9)  Teachers: Keep Your Answers Real [as opposed to your “best guess”]

            *) Separating Emes from Sheker

            *) “Train your tongue to say, ‘I don’t know...’” (B’rachos 4a)

     10) A “Renewed” Sanhedrin: The Key to ‘Getting Back to the Basics’ [And getting away from the na’arishkeit!]

            *) Devarim 17:8

            *) Sefer HaChinuch #496

     11) One Heart, One Way: As it was at Sinai, as it will be in Yemos HaMashiach (?)

            *) Or HaChayim: Parashas Shemos

            *) 12 Paths/70 Facets w/”Everyone has different finger prints”

            *) Part of T’shuvah Shalaymah?

     12) Mashiach, The Rebbe, Emunas Chachamim: Are we confusing the “messenger” who Hw Who sent the Message?

     13) Miracles: They originate with HaShem and are conducted by Him THROUGH His messengers

            *) Miracles: as a test

     14) Moshe & Mashiach: WHO or ‘who’ took us out of Egypt?  WHO or ‘who’ will ingather us from this Edomite Gallus?

     15) The Selichos that address Melachim, and ask them to take our prayers to HaShem – this practice seems to contradict the Principle that out prayers may only be addressed to HaShem.

Regarding the Footer

Onkelos, Bereshis 2:7 – And man became a speaking being.”

Devarim 27:8. And you shall write upon the stones all the words of this Torah very plainly.

Pirkei Avos 1:11. “...Scholars, be cautious with your words, for you may incur the penalty of exile and be banished to a place of evil waters [heresy].  The disciples who follow you there may drink and die, and consequently the name of Heaven will be desecrated.”

Pirkei Avos 2:5. “...Do not make a statement that cannot be easily understood on the ground that it will be understood eventually....

            Pirkei Avos 1:11. ...Scholars, be cautious with your words, for you may incur the penalty of exile and be banished to a place of evil waters [heresy].  The disciples who follow you there may drink and die, and consequently the name of Heaven will be desecrated.”

            The Sforno on this Mishnah understands it to mean: “He [Avtalyon] cautioned [the wise to be careful with their words] when the heretics grew in number and they misinterpreted the words of the Torah and the Sages, and their esoteric teachings, according to their own corrupt beliefs.  When he [Avtalyon] speaks of ‘the penalty of exile,’ he means being exiled from town to town.  [In essence] he says, ‘You may be exiled to a city of heretics, who will also interpret your words according to their distorted ideology.  For they [The disciples who follow you there] will erroneously conclude that you embrace [this distorted ideology], but you have chosen not to express your opinion publicly.”

            While this understanding teaches us a good lesson about the importance of making our words clear in the presence of students who already possess heretical beliefs, so as not to strengthen their false views, we believe that this interpretation does not represent the plain meaning of the words of the words of Avos. Rather, we would understand this Mishnah thusly:

            “Sages, be careful with your words, for an unclear [or improper] understanding may cause you to scew your own hashkafah emes into a hashkafah sheker, and you may be exiled from a place of emes to one of sheker.  And your students, who follow your teachings and understandings, may drink of your faulty hashkafos, and die [spiritually] because because of your mistaken understandings, and as a result the Name of Heaven – the Source of Hashkafa Emes – will be desecrated, as one HaShem’s designated teachers will have failed to pass on teachings of truth, and instead will be guilty of imparting sheker.”

            However, one might ask, how could a Sage come to misinterpret the Torah he has received from his teachers?  What is it about teaching Torah that increases the possibility of saying something tainted by heresy?  We believe a possible answer is found in the Gemara (Makkos 10a):

           “Rabina explained, Whoever delights in teaching a multitude [of scholars] has increase, which is to the same effect as what Rabbi said: Much Torah have I learnt from my Masters, more from my fellow  students, and from my disciples most of all!

            Now while it is true that the plain meaning of this Gemara is that there is much to be gained from teaching, just as there is much to be gained in all areas of Torah, where there is much to be gained, there is the possibility of much to loose.  Students often ask questions of their Rebbe that are outside of their Rebbe’s sphere of learning [or current sphere of study], or the students may ask questions that have, literally, never been asked before.  And it just may be that when responding to these types of questions, the teacher might say something unclear – both to his own mind and that of his students.  Also, it is an accepted axiom that to truly master any subject matter one learns the most when he teaches the material.  And with the complexities of Torah, the potential for error is ever-present.  So when a teacher is imparting Torah, he is essentially re-affirming the material in his own mind, and if he is not careful, he just might impart a teaching that is tainted with sheker in a way that crosses the boundaries of heresy, and he will in essence inject a faulty teaching into his own purview.

             A complimentary Mishnah from Avos (2:5) states:

             “...Do not make a statement that cannot be easily understood on the ground that it will be understood eventually....” 

            It is this Mishnah, we believe, that concerns itself with a teacher who has a proper understanding of the material, but does not state the teaching in an easily understood manner.  Thus the student may come to an improper understanding simply because the material was not expressed in a clear manner, and the fault will be the teachers for not making the material easily accessible.

 


 

[1]               One of the examples given for an unintentional sin is the Yid who is unaware that it is forbidden to cook on Shabbos.  This Yid lacked the knowledge to keep Shabbos properly, but because he was unaware of the hallachic ramifications of cooking on Shabbos, the transgression is considered to be unintentional.  However, when dealing with matters of hashkafah, matters which the Rambam codified in his Thirteen Principles, and contained within the Six Constant Mitzvos, even if the transgression is “unintentional,” the transgressor is considered a nebuch apikoras (unfortunate heretic), and cannot hide behind his lack of KNOWLEDGE.  This possibility of being a nebuch appikoras is why having a well balanced foundation to one’s Yiddishkeit is essential.

 

 

 

TORAH U'MESORAH M'SINAI Home Especially for Non Jews
Our Site Map YNbenAvraham@aol.com